On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2013-07-10 20:52:15 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> > But this can be preferable if the removed package has security bugs
>> > and has been removed for this reason
On 2013-07-10 20:52:15 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > But this can be preferable if the removed package has security bugs
> > and has been removed for this reason (the user wouldn't be aware of
> > that with the current behav
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Beside: Detecting this would be pretty hard and full of cornercases
> > (especially as yours is already one as it crosses source-package
> > boundaries):
> > It wouldn't be that great if a package is removed from testing and the
On 2013-07-10 15:43:33 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> clang is no longer in unstable (the package – and its not the
> reason, but I wouldn't expect it to work based on that)
clang is still in unstable:
$ apt-show-versions -a clang
clang:amd64 1:3.0-6.2 install ok installed
clang:amd64 1:3.0-
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> # apt-get install clang
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> clang : Depends: clang-3.2 (>= 3.2-1~) but it is not going to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
> This is due to:
cla
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.9
Severity: normal
When a package is removed from Debian, it breaks the upgrade system.
For instance:
# apt-get install clang
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
clang : Depends: clang-3.2 (>= 3.2-1~) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct
6 matches
Mail list logo
