Bug#712740: the default is fine

2013-06-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-06-19 10:44:39 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is what /etc/sysctl.d/ is for: changing defaults. Yes, but IMHO, the default is not fine (see below). > There are, in fact, real protections with this change. Namely, the delay of > attack expansion. Take the case of a server being attacked. I

Bug#712740: the default is fine

2013-06-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:44:39AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is what /etc/sysctl.d/ is for: changing defaults. > > There are, in fact, real protections with this change. Namely, the delay of > attack expansion. Take the case of a server being attacked. If there are > ssh connections left open

Bug#712740: the default is fine

2013-06-19 Thread Kees Cook
This is what /etc/sysctl.d/ is for: changing defaults. There are, in fact, real protections with this change. Namely, the delay of attack expansion. Take the case of a server being attacked. If there are ssh connections left open from that machine, without the ptrace restrictions, an attacker can