On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Iain,
> >
> > thanks for the patch, however db5.3 will be obsoleted by db6.0 (in NEW),
> so this won't be fixed.
> >
> > Would it be possible for you to check if db6.0 is affected?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:24:10PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Iain,
> >
> > thanks for the patch, however db5.3 will be obsoleted by db6.0 (in NEW), so
> > this won't be fixed.
> >
> > Would it be possible for you to check if db6.0
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Iain,
>
> thanks for the patch, however db5.3 will be obsoleted by db6.0 (in NEW), so
> this won't be fixed.
>
> Would it be possible for you to check if db6.0 is affected?
OK, thanks for the info. I checked it out of git and had a
Iain,
thanks for the patch, however db5.3 will be obsoleted by db6.0 (in NEW), so
this won't be fixed.
Would it be possible for you to check if db6.0 is affected?
Ondřej Surý
> On 14. 6. 2013, at 19:17, Iain Lane wrote:
>
> Package: db5.3
> Version: 5.3.21-1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch u
Package: db5.3
Version: 5.3.21-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch upstream
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu saucy ubuntu-patch
Hi,
libdb_sql-5.3 doesn't link with libraries it uses. I'm not sure why but
I don't see this problem in sid, hence the severity. I suspect it's due
5 matches
Mail list logo
