On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:49:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> fwiw, as unstable also has 0.83, it would need to be fixed there first.
Yes. I tried to point out that upstream did not release a version including
this fix yet.
Now we have unstable fixed. Could the maintainer be please so kind to
Hi!
Am 2013-06-06 23:15, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> It is not in 0.84. Can you fix this in stable, please?
> armel seems not to be affected.
fwiw, as unstable also has 0.83, it would need to be fixed there
first.
Yeah, I have a 0.84-1 package in the queue and I'm already nagging my
sponsor.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:49:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 16:45 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > It is not in 0.84. Can you fix this in stable, please?
> > armel seems not to be affected.
>
> fwiw, as unstable also has 0.83, it would need to be fixed there
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 16:45 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> It is not in 0.84. Can you fix this in stable, please?
> armel seems not to be affected.
fwiw, as unstable also has 0.83, it would need to be fixed there first.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req
Package: rt-tests
Version: 0.83-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch fixed-upstream
hackbench is a major component in this package and it can't be used on armhf:
|$ hackbench
|Running in process mode with 10 groups using 40 file descriptors each (== 400
tasks)
|Each sender will pass 100 messages of
5 matches
Mail list logo
