Bug#710399: bliss: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2013-06-01 Thread David Bremner
Sylvestre Ledru writes: > -CFLAGS += -O9 > +CFLAGS += -O4 Is there a good reason to use O4 rather than O3? d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#710399: bliss: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2013-06-01 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 01/06/2013 23:25, David Bremner wrote: > Sylvestre Ledru writes: > >> -CFLAGS += -O9 >> +CFLAGS += -O4 > > Is there a good reason to use O4 rather than O3? -O4 is valid. I guess that gcc, with -O9, fallback to the biggest optimization available. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Bug#710399: bliss: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2013-05-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Package: bliss Version: 0.72-4 Severity: minor User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: clang-ftbfs Hello, Using the rebuild infrastructure http://buildd-clang.debian.net/, your package fails to build with clang (instead of gcc). You can see the full log here: http://buildd-clang.de