On 2014-01-30 13:40:33, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 20:51:51 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
snip
> > Looks like this has been done for a while, so closing.
> >
> Not quite. libpqxx3 is still not removed from sid and jessie, which is
> why I'd left this open.
Hi guys,
I reques
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 20:51:51 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-05-28 22:52, Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) wrote:
> > title = "libpqxx";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ "libpqxx-3.1" | .depends ~ "libpqxx-4.0";
> > is_good = .depends ~ "libpqxx-4.0";
> > is_bad = .depends ~ "libpqxx-3.1";
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 21:52:49 +0100, Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Upstream changed ABI therefore libpqxx-4.0 package has been uploaded into
> experimental just before Wheez
On 2013-11-26 22:35:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
> calligra FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=calligra
Hi Julien,
Thx for the info, but I'm not sure if there is anything I can do about it as it
looks like upstream bug. I just filled a bug (#730632) against calligra
package.
I th
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 13:45:20 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 20:50:40 +, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
>
> > On 2013-11-14 20:22:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Hrm. Why did the -dev package name change? That makes it harder than
> > > necessary to rebuild the reverse deps
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 20:50:40 +, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> On 2013-11-14 20:22:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Hrm. Why did the -dev package name change? That makes it harder than
> > necessary to rebuild the reverse deps, since they now need a sourceful
> > upload. Please either bring back l
On 2013-11-14 20:22:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hrm. Why did the -dev package name change? That makes it harder than
> necessary to rebuild the reverse deps, since they now need a sourceful
> upload. Please either bring back libpqxx3-dev, or at least call the new
> package libpqxx-dev instead of
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 21:52:49 +0100, Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Upstream changed ABI therefore libpqxx-4.0 package has been uploaded into
> experimental just before Wheez
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: owner -1 !
On 2013-11-01 18:58, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> I'd like to upload subjected package to sid, as kde transition finished some
> time ago, I assume it's ok to do so, right?
>
Sorry for the delay; I believe we are ready to start this, so please go
Hi Guys,
I'd like to upload subjected package to sid, as kde transition finished some
time ago, I assume it's ok to do so, right?
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" |
|0|0|0| kuLa - |
gpg --keys
On 2013-08-13 10:47:32, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
Hi Julien, hi release team,
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 08:55:02 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> > is there any chance that you can give me an estimation when it'll be
> > possible
> > to upload subjected package to unstable?
Hi Marcin,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 08:55:02 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> is there any chance that you can give me an estimation when it'll be possible
> to upload subjected package to unstable?
After kde 4.10 makes it to testing should be a good time (calligra is
involved in both the
Hi Guys,
is there any chance that you can give me an estimation when it'll be possible
to upload subjected package to unstable?
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" |
|0|0|0| kuLa - |
gpg --keyser
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream changed ABI therefore libpqxx-4.0 package has been uploaded into
experimental just before Wheezy freeze.
There is source package name change back to libpqxx to avoid further sour
14 matches
Mail list logo
