Bug#710143: transition: libraw

2013-07-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:41:29 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > 2013/7/10 Julien Cristau : > > Assuming you're prepared to nmu the rdeps feel free to move this to sid. > > Thanks! > > libraw 0.15.3-1 built everywhere, and I just uploaded fixed packages > for shotwell and freeimage. Could you ple

Bug#710143: transition: libraw

2013-07-11 Thread Luca Falavigna
2013/7/10 Julien Cristau : > Assuming you're prepared to nmu the rdeps feel free to move this to sid. Thanks! libraw 0.15.3-1 built everywhere, and I just uploaded fixed packages for shotwell and freeimage. Could you please schedule binNMUs for the other two packages? nmu entangle_0.5.1-1 . ALL

Bug#710143: transition: libraw

2013-07-10 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 17:39:40 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: block -1 by 710133 710141 > > > I'd like to request a slot for taking care of

Bug#710143: transition: libraw

2013-06-24 Thread Luca Falavigna
2013/5/28 Luca Falavigna : > freeimage FTBFS (#710133), but upstream already has a patch to fix it. > Also shotwell FTBFS (#710141), issue has been forwarded upstream. Blockers have patches to allow build against newer libraw, so this transition should proceed smoothly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#710143: transition: libraw

2013-05-28 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block -1 by 710133 710141 I'd like to request a slot for taking care of the libraw transition. The new upstream release (in experimental) has bumped soname. Reverse dependenci