Bug#709758: Consciously blocking packages and development

2013-09-06 Thread Norbert Preining
#hopefull this time I manage it without typos severity 709758 wishlist retitle 709758 please update build-deps away from transitional packages thanks > thank you very much! Welcome. Norbert PREINING, Norbert

Bug#709758: Consciously blocking packages and development

2013-09-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Norbert, On Freitag, 6. September 2013, Norbert Preining wrote: > TeX Live has reintroduced all the transitional packages, thus > the FTBFS is gone and this bug is a wishlist bug to replace > the outdated deps. thank you very much! cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is

Bug#709758: Consciously blocking packages and development

2013-09-06 Thread Norbert Preining
severity 709758 whishlist retitle please remove build dep on transitional packages thanks TeX Live has reintroduced all the transitional packages, thus the FTBFS is gone and this bug is a wishlist bug to replace the outdated deps. Enjoy Norbert --

Bug#709758: Consciously blocking packages and development

2013-09-03 Thread Ondřej Surý
It would probably more helpful to approach our release team asking for advice how to proceed with transition than sending this blunt rant into d-d. O. On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear maintainers of debian-edu-doc, all of d-d > > [short explanation for d-d: debian

Bug#709758: Consciously blocking packages and development

2013-09-02 Thread Norbert Preining
Dear maintainers of debian-edu-doc, all of d-d [short explanation for d-d: debian-edu-doc has a serious bug since it build-deps on a not existing package. Instead of transiting to the new pakcage naming, it keeps the old anme hindering transition) On Do, 15 Aug 2013, Norbert Preining wrote: > th