Control: reassign -1 libnetcf1 0.1.9-2
Control: fixed -1 1:0.2.3-4
Control: affects -1 + libvirt
Hi
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 08:21:56AM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> Hi Salvatore, Hi All,
>
> On 10/04/15 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >Hi Daniel, hi all,
> >
> >On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 07:2
Hi Salvatore, Hi All,
On 10/04/15 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Daniel, hi all,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 07:24:20PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
Hi Salvatore,
No. You are right the leak is still there. The newer version in wheezy did
fix another issue I had though.
Any chance of appl
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:13:47PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> If so I would reassing the bug to netcf, adding fixing version and as
> well contact the stable release manager to propose the attache debdiff
> for the the upcoming wheezy point update.
*sigh*, if I say I'm attaching the
Hi Daniel, hi all,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 07:24:20PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> No. You are right the leak is still there. The newer version in wheezy did
> fix another issue I had though.
>
> Any chance of applying the patching to the wheezy version? It's a really
> ann
Hi Salvatore,
No. You are right the leak is still there. The newer version in wheezy
did fix another issue I had though.
Any chance of applying the patching to the wheezy version? It's a
really annoying bug.
My apologies for the misdirection.
Daniel
On 09/04/15 18:58, Salvatore Bonaccor
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:23:24PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:12:02 +0100 Horst Schirmeier
> wrote:
> >On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Horst Schirmeier wrote:
> >> We're seeing this on x86-64 Wheezy with the libvirt backports version
> >> (currently 1.2.9-9~bpo
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:12:02 +0100 Horst Schirmeier
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Horst Schirmeier wrote:
> We're seeing this on x86-64 Wheezy with the libvirt backports version
> (currently 1.2.9-9~bpo70+1), too. A virt-manager client was attached
> several days, ramping up libvirtd memory u
We're seeing this on x86-64 Wheezy with the libvirt backports version
(currently 1.2.9-9~bpo70+1), too. A virt-manager client was attached
several days, ramping up libvirtd memory usage (RES) to >8GB.
The workaround (restarting libvirtd) helped.
--
PGP-Key 0xD40E0E7A
signature.asc
Description
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Horst Schirmeier wrote:
> We're seeing this on x86-64 Wheezy with the libvirt backports version
> (currently 1.2.9-9~bpo70+1), too. A virt-manager client was attached
> several days, ramping up libvirtd memory usage (RES) to >8GB.
>
> The workaround (restarting libvirtd) help
9 matches
Mail list logo
