Hey,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:12:57PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mo, 20 Mai 2013, Michael Schutte wrote:
> > No, texlive-binaries is at 2012.20120628-4 here. Since I’m completely
> > unfamiliar with versioning and interrelationships of TeX packages,
> > here are my installed versions f
Hi,
On Mo, 20 Mai 2013, Michael Schutte wrote:
> No, texlive-binaries is at 2012.20120628-4 here. Since I’m completely
> unfamiliar with versioning and interrelationships of TeX packages,
> here are my installed versions for everything starting in texlive:
Ok, and tex-common and luatex?
> I hav
Hey Norbert,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:54:48PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> thanks for your email.
>
> On Mo, 20 Mai 2013, Michael Schutte wrote:
> > Same for me. FWIW, I’m still running tex-common 4.02 because I saw this
>
> ?? And which texlive-binaries?
>
> > kdebug: =
> > /etc/texmf
Hi MIchael,
thanks for your email.
On Mo, 20 Mai 2013, Michael Schutte wrote:
> Same for me. FWIW, I’m still running tex-common 4.02 because I saw this
?? And which texlive-binaries?
> kdebug: =
> /etc/texmf/web2c:/usr/local/share/texmf/web2c:/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/web2c
That looks l
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:33:38PM +0200, Eddy F. wrote:
> I experience the same bug.
>
> Re message #10, the output of the
>
> kpsewhich -var-value=TEXMFROOT
>
> command is empty.
Same for me. FWIW, I’m still running tex-common 4.02 because I saw this
report in apt-listbugs (and noticed that
Dear maintainer,
I experience the same bug.
Re message #10, the output of the
kpsewhich -var-value=TEXMFROOT
command is empty.
--
Eddy F.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
6 matches
Mail list logo
