On 10-06-13 22:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
> My findings:
> via (include/via.h): no diff
> xmhtml (include/XmHTML/XmHTML.h): ABI/API is not compatible
>
> I did not succeed with the others yet for different reasons.
> dx: I fail to configure it (not understood yet)
dx: (include/dx/dx.h after "debian/r
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 22:32:08 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> glw: fails with GLwDrawA.h:147:0: Undefined identifier WidgetClass
defined in as "typedef struct _WidgetClassRec
*WidgetClass;"
> sciplot: fails to check right now on
> /usr/include/X11/Core.h:51:0: Undefined identifier _XFUNCPROTOBEG
On 09-06-13 11:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 04-06-13 08:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Do we know how many of the lesstif2 reverse dependencies are libraries
>> whose ABI would change if rebuilt with motif instead?
>
> No, but I can try to find out. The original idea of lesstif was to be a
> binary c
On 04-06-13 08:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Do we know how many of the lesstif2 reverse dependencies are libraries
> whose ABI would change if rebuilt with motif instead?
No, but I can try to find out. The original idea of lesstif was to be a
binary compatible replacement, but I don't know how well
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 23:01:39 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We have not started talking to the maintainers of packages depending on
> lesstif2 (other than a message to d-devel [1]), as I wanted to have the
> way clear before that. Graham Inggs has tested building all the reverse
> dependencies [2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi RT,
I assume you prefer to receive this discussion in a transition bug,
therefore submitting it now. For reference, this is a follow-up on
6 matches
Mail list logo
