On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:55:58PM -0400, Len Sorensen wrote:
> And first guess got it:
>
> If I build using wheezy official packages as build-deps, then jetty builds
> fine. If I replace just libgeronimo-jta-1.1-spec-java_1.1.1-2_all.deb
> with the one I rebuilt myself (in wheezy), then jetty fa
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:12:51PM -0400, Len Sorensen wrote:
> I can confirm that is true.
>
> On the other hand it seems if you recompile some of the dependancies it
> uses then it breaks.
>
> Now which dependancy could be breaking if you recompile it in wheezy to
> cause this problem I wonder.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:36:47AM -0400, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (Random #-changes reader.)
>
> Len Sorensen (15/05/2013):
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:17:30AM -0400, tony mancill wrote:
> > > I am able to build the package in a clean wheezy chroot, so I'm not sure
> > > yet what's going on h
(Random #-changes reader.)
Len Sorensen (15/05/2013):
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:17:30AM -0400, tony mancill wrote:
> > I am able to build the package in a clean wheezy chroot, so I'm not sure
> > yet what's going on here yet. Any chance you're trying to build with a
> > different JDK than the
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:17:30AM -0400, tony mancill wrote:
> I am able to build the package in a clean wheezy chroot, so I'm not sure
> yet what's going on here yet. Any chance you're trying to build with a
> different JDK than the default-jdk?
I am using sbuild, pointing at wheezy, so I would
On 05/15/2013 07:56 AM, Len Sorensen wrote:
> Package: jetty
> Version: 6.1.26-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> I am trying to create a small subset of wheezy that is self contained,
> and as part of building things, jetty f
Package: jetty
Version: 6.1.26-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
I am trying to create a small subset of wheezy that is self contained,
and as part of building things, jetty failed to build. Strangely it looks
a lot like an old bug
7 matches
Mail list logo