Bug#708390: Dirty indeed

2013-05-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Kalle Söderman wrote: > Noticed this discussion and would like to add that my intention when > designing the front page layout and the original banner (for the website > re-design way back) was that the banner would change more often than it does > now. I never ima

Bug#708390: Dirty indeed

2013-05-16 Thread Kalle Söderman
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Nicolae Crefelean wrote: > > > Is it too late to spread the word all over again for new graphics? I know > > some people who could try their hand if they had time and given the > chance. > > It is too late for wh

Bug#708390: Dirty indeed

2013-05-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Nicolae Crefelean wrote: > Is it too late to spread the word all over again for new graphics? I know > some people who could try their hand if they had time and given the chance. It is too late for wheezy, but not too late for jessie, which is only just getting st

Bug#708390: Dirty indeed

2013-05-15 Thread Nicolae Crefelean
Hi, Victor! :) I agree people get bored, even with nice and shiny "fruit" products. They can also have difficulties in finding something more exciting and more pleasing to the masses. However, that doesn't change anyone's right to share their opinion just because they can't provide something b

Bug#708390: Dirty indeed

2013-05-15 Thread Victor Nițu
On Thu, 16 May 2013 00:56:34 +0300 Nicolae Crefelean wrote: > > > Some of you guys feel it's OK just because you designed or approved > it, but it still looks dirty - as an oil splash or something. We might > argue whether it's appropriate for some geeks to rant over a minor > graphical change

Bug#708390: Dirty indeed

2013-05-15 Thread Nicolae Crefelean
Some of you guys feel it's OK just because you designed or approved it, but it still looks dirty - as an oil splash or something. We might argue whether it's appropriate for some geeks to rant over a minor graphical change on the Debian site, but we could also argue why such an uninspired change