Michael, you can depend on 0.11-2, it should hopefully have all the stuff
you mentioned fixed.
O.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> it's the dreaded directories-not-replaced-by-symlink bug for transitional
> packages.
>
> I will upload fixed packages.
>
> O.
Hi Michael,
it's the dreaded directories-not-replaced-by-symlink bug for transitional
packages.
I will upload fixed packages.
O.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 17.05.2013 12:27, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
> > I have verified that libjson0 with just symlinks works (runnin
Am 06.06.2013 19:18, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 17.05.2013 12:27, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
>> I have verified that libjson0 with just symlinks works (running
>> psensor), and building with libjson0-dev ends with libjson-c2 as
>> dependency (upstart).
>>
>> Thus I am ready to upload the package to unst
Am 17.05.2013 12:27, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
> I have verified that libjson0 with just symlinks works (running
> psensor), and building with libjson0-dev ends with libjson-c2 as
> dependency (upstart).
>
> Thus I am ready to upload the package to unstable.
The libjson0-dev package that landed in uns
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I have verified that libjson0 with just symlinks works (running
> psensor), and building with libjson0-dev ends with libjson-c2 as
^^
> dependency (upstart).
> Thus I am read
I have verified that libjson0 with just symlinks works (running
psensor), and building with libjson0-dev ends with libjson-c2 as
dependency (upstart).
Thus I am ready to upload the package to unstable.
Ondrej
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Good question. I guess I got stu
Good question. I guess I got stuck in the upstream way of 'compatibility'.
That's the best solution. I'll prepare the packages in experimental and we'll
see.
Ondřej Surý
On 16. 5. 2013, at 12:03, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:25:32 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:25:32 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Ondřej,
> >
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >> JSON-C upstream has renamed the library from libjson.so to
> >> libjson-c.so,
Hi Steve,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Ondřej,
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> JSON-C upstream has renamed the library from libjson.so to
>> libjson-c.so, headers are now in /usr/include/json-c and pkg-config is
>> called json-c.
Hi Ondřej,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> JSON-C upstream has renamed the library from libjson.so to
> libjson-c.so, headers are now in /usr/include/json-c and pkg-config is
> called json-c.
> There's a compatibility layer (symlinks and libjson.so.0), but since
> t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team and affected maintainers,
Disclaimer: I need new json-c to fix RC licensing bug in php5 (thus I
do care about this package more than I do care for some other).
JSON-C u
11 matches
Mail list logo