Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 11:04 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 07/15/2013 06:54 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > It looks like the upload got rejected by dak: > > > > $ cat queue/reject/trac_0.12.5-3~deb7u1_amd64.changes.reason > > trac_0.12.5.orig.tar.gz: Does not m

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 07/15/2013 06:54 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It looks like the upload got rejected by dak: > > $ cat queue/reject/trac_0.12.5-3~deb7u1_amd64.changes.reason > trac_0.12.5.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the pool. > > and indeed > > -rw-r- 1 dak debadmin 2468980 Jul 1

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 19:09 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 07/14/2013 10:32 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Please use "wheezy" as the distribution, version the upload as > > "0.12.5-3~deb7u1" and go ahead; thanks. > > Thanks! I've gone ahead with the upload. Please let me know if > an

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 07/14/2013 10:32 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please use "wheezy" as the distribution, version the upload as > "0.12.5-3~deb7u1" and go ahead; thanks. Thanks! I've gone ahead with the upload. Please let me know if anything seems amiss. --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP dig

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 22:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:58 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > On 06/29/2013 06:51 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > [...] > > >> I hope that m

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:58 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 06/29/2013 06:51 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: [...] > >> I hope that my filtered diffs attached in > >> http://bugs.debian.org/707650#24 are useful. Please let me know

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 06/29/2013 06:51 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> On Sun 2013-06-09 13:05:24 -0400, "Adam D. Barratt" >> wrote: > [...] >>> Filtered diffs are definitely appreciated and useful, yes. >> >> I hope that my filtered diffs attached in >>

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-06-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sun 2013-06-09 13:05:24 -0400, "Adam D. Barratt" > wrote: [...] > > Filtered diffs are definitely appreciated and useful, yes. > > I hope that my filtered diffs attached in > http://bugs.debian.org/707650#24 are useful. Please l

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-06-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Debian Release folks-- Thanks for your work on preparing debian 7.1! On Sun 2013-06-09 13:05:24 -0400, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:02 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> On 09-05-13 23:49, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> > The size of the changeset between 0.12.3 and 0.12.5 i

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-06-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:02 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 09-05-13 23:49, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > The size of the changeset between 0.12.3 and 0.12.5 is unfortunately > > large, but this is mainly for two reasons: > > Probably this sentence is part of the reason why you haven't had any > r

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-06-02 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Daniel, [Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team] On 09-05-13 23:49, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > The size of the changeset between 0.12.3 and 0.12.5 is unfortunately > large, but this is mainly for two reasons: Probably this sentence is part of the reason why you haven't had any respon

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-05-18 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Hi, I'm using the Trac 0.12.5-3 package in production and can confirm, that it is in a good state. The upgrade from wheezys 0.12.3-1 was completely transparent. Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-05-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello good release-team people-- I would like to propose trac 0.12.5-3 (or some variant of it if you prefer) as a canididate for the next wheezy point release. We have 0.12.3-1 in wheezy, so th