On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Mark Brown , 2013-05-03, 14:17:
> >Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 9), dpkg-dev (>= 1.6.1)
> Did you mean "(>= 1.16.1)" here?
Meh, yes sorry.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Mark Brown , 2013-05-03, 14:17:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 9), dpkg-dev (>= 1.6.1)
Did you mean "(>= 1.16.1)" here?
E: cvsgraph source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)
Anyway, "dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)" is satifised by dpkg-dev in wheezy, so
we should remove this check in t
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.10.5
Severity: important
A package with the following Build-Depends:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 9), dpkg-dev (>= 1.6.1), libgd2-noxpm-dev |
libgd2-xpm-dev, bison | byacc, flex, libfreetype6-dev
reports that:
E: cvsgraph source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev
3 matches
Mail list logo