Bug#705548: josm: backport josm

2016-06-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 pending Now that the embedded metadata-extractor is used, packporting josm has less impact. No newer version of libmetadata-extractor-java is required for josm now, which would break its other reverse dependencies (gpsprune & tika). Backporting josm requires backporting jmapview

Bug#705548: josm: backport josm

2013-04-20 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:12:55 +0200, colliar wrote: > Why not just adapt migration policy from testing ? > So testing and stable-backport will be the same version. I can try. > I do not know your update circles. But I would expect experimental to > have at maximum a delay of ten days compared to

Bug#705548: josm: backport josm

2013-04-20 Thread colliar
On 19.04.2013 23:28, David Paleino wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:52:44 +0200, colliar wrote: Hey >> I could live with a three month delay but everything older is quite >> outdated regarding josm's development. > > I know :| > > I will try maintaining a backport, just don't expect it to be rel

Bug#705548: josm: backport josm

2013-04-19 Thread David Paleino
tags 705548 = confirmed thanks On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:52:44 +0200, colliar wrote: > Hey David Hello, > As sooner or later Debian 7 will be released, it would be nice to have > a backport version of josm as its development is quite fast and it does > not fit that well with Debian Release Strateg

Bug#705548: josm: backport josm

2013-04-16 Thread colliar
Package: josm Severity: wishlist Hey David As sooner or later Debian 7 will be released, it would be nice to have a backport version of josm as its development is quite fast and it does not fit that well with Debian Release Strategy. Sorry, but I would always advice people to use josm-tested or