There is upstream activity, at http://xgraph.org, which I'm looking into.
If nothing happens I think the package can go, but please queue this
up another few weeks...
Cheers,
--Barak.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 at 10:51:50 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> (xgraph does so little, it is tempting to drop it and just replicate its
> functionality in something more modern and extensible.)
3 years later, I think it's time to remove this package from unstable.
This would also require rem
> Any progress here?
> Today it's one year since I sent my first message.
Naturally this got buried.
Thanks for the reminder.
(xgraph does so little, it is tempting to drop it and just replicate its
functionality in something more modern and extensible.)
C
Any progress here?
Today it's one year since I sent my first message.
Ulrich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 705152 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 705152 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 15:18 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Has there been any further progress towards getting this resolved?
>
> Not th
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 18:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Steven Ayre wrote:
> > > Correction to previous patch - contained a file that wasn't meant to
> > > be included.
> >
> > This is a good start, but unfortunately, it isn't
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 18:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Steven Ayre wrote:
> > Correction to previous patch - contained a file that wasn't meant to
> > be included.
>
> This is a good start, but unfortunately, it isn't enough.
>
> If you grep through the source tree for PW,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Steven Ayre wrote:
> Correction to previous patch - contained a file that wasn't meant to
> be included.
This is a good start, but unfortunately, it isn't enough.
If you grep through the source tree for PW, you'll also find
additional bits by Paul Walker.
It might be necessa
Correction to previous patch - contained a file that wasn't meant to
be included.
xgraph-705152-2.patch
Description: Binary data
How about something like this patch. It removes the DO_DER code via repack.
I've left the code tagged PW in for now - reading the copyright
message it specifically discusses routines so perhaps these aren't
covered. They would still need to be examined though.
xgraph-705152-1.patch
Description:
It does appear that there is code by Paul Walker included in the binary
release even though DO_DER is not defined.
Grep the source for PW
These parts would probably need to be stripped out too. Using repack to
create a +dfsg orig tarball in the same way as mysql-server might work
(I'm working on
Hi!
> So I suppose I will have to dust off my email archives from ... longer
> ago than I care to think, and try to figure it out.
Are there any updates on this?
It would be nice to find a quick solution here, we're very close to
release :).
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :'
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> A *long* time ago, I went through a chain of contacts and got to
> someone who had the authority and desire to take care of this. I
> don't remember the details: whether they said they'd do something
> (relicense or a letter or whatever) and it sli
A *long* time ago, I went through a chain of contacts and got to someone
who had the authority and desire to take care of this. I don't remember
the details: whether they said they'd do something (relicense or a
letter or whatever) and it slipped off their radar, or if their email
was sufficient a
Package: xgraph
Severity: serious
Version: 12.1-15
Ulrich Mueller reported this to debian-le...@lists.debian.org. FWICT,
at least the contents of the source package are not distributable by
Debian in main. It's possible that the binary packages do not contain
any work which is copyrighted by Paul
15 matches
Mail list logo
