Bug#704444: unblock: cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-4

2013-04-11 Thread Paul Gevers
On 11-04-13 19:00, Niels Thykier wrote: > As I approved of the changed that let to this regression, I would like > to see this mess cleaned up before r0 if possible. :) Good to hear. > Paul, seeing some users are surprised that the "folding" is broken on > upgrades[1], would it be possible to add

Bug#704444: unblock: cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-4

2013-04-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-04-03 21:30, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 03-04-13 01:08, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> [...] > >> Either way it's rather a large diff, I'm inclined towards deferring to a >> point release at least... > Hey, As I approved of the changed that let to this regression, I would like to see this me

Bug#704444: unblock: cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-4

2013-04-03 Thread Paul Gevers
On 03-04-13 01:08, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:03:09AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> I have attached the debdiff between version 3 currently in Wheezy and >> version 4, now in unstable. > > Being a regression and, if I understand correctly from others, rather > awkward fo

Bug#704444: unblock: cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-4

2013-04-02 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:03:09AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I have attached the debdiff between version 3 currently in Wheezy and > version 4, now in unstable. Being a regression and, if I understand correctly from others, rather awkward for users, I'm surprised to see this bug is severity