Justin B Rye wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> [...] It seems to me we should put all our coverage of
>> redundant packages in 4.4.3 (mentioning "apt-get autoremove" and
>> avoiding the word "obsolete"), put all our coverage of relic packages
>> in 4.9, and leave the two sections completely unconnec
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Is it still true that deborphan is "highly recommended", or is that a
> leftover from the days when it was the only tool that implemented any
> of this functionality?
>
> And does popcon-largest-unused still work? It thinks I don't use my
> web browser or window manager. Is
Justin B Rye wrote:
> [...] It seems to me we should put all our coverage of
> redundant packages in 4.4.3 (mentioning "apt-get autoremove" and
> avoiding the word "obsolete"), put all our coverage of relic packages
> in 4.9, and leave the two sections completely unconnected.
Here's an attempt at
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>>> * Run aptitude and look for the "Obsolete and Locally
>>>Created Packages" category, which will contain packages
>>>from previous releases that you never bothered to remove.
>>
>> These may be "obsolete", but unless they're *also
Package: release-notes
Version: r9661
Tags: wheezy patch
Justin B Rye wrote:
> I don't see anything about "apt-get autoremove" in the copy I've just
> checked out of SVN... nothing about that or aptitude's older support
> for the same feature.
Yeah, that was me guessing about the intent. There'
5 matches
Mail list logo
