Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 11:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:19 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > > "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > >> The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
> > >> or -11~deb7u1.
> >
> > I thin
Control: tags - 1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:19 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> >> The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
> >> or -11~deb7u1.
>
> I think we'll go with the latter; that should be more descriptive as it
retitle 704227 pu: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1
tags 704227 - unblock + wheezy pu
thanks
Hi,
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>> The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
>> or -11~deb7u1.
I think we'll go with the latter; that should be more descriptive as it
is a
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 18:50 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> This went into sid with version 9.0+ds1-11 and has migrated to jessie.
>>
>> For a pu upload, would the version number have to be 9.0+ds1-11+deb7u1 ?
>
> The version needs to be lower than that in testing,
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 18:50 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> This went into sid with version 9.0+ds1-11 and has migrated to jessie.
>
> For a pu upload, would the version number have to be 9.0+ds1-11+deb7u1 ?
The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
or -11~deb7u1
Hi,
This went into sid with version 9.0+ds1-11 and has migrated to jessie.
For a pu upload, would the version number have to be 9.0+ds1-11+deb7u1 ?
The debdiff would be otherwise the same as proposed in
http://bugs.debian.org/704227#5
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
6 matches
Mail list logo
