* [2013-03-13 22:12:25 +0100] S?bastien Villemot wrote:
Le mercredi 13 mars 2013 à 11:58 -0600, Vincent Danen a écrit :
This issue was given the name CVE-2010-3312 quite a while ago. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3312 for more info.
I don???t think this is the same
* [2013-03-13 23:10:41 +0100] S?bastien Villemot wrote:
Le mercredi 13 mars 2013 à 15:59 -0600, Vincent Danen a écrit :
* [2013-03-13 22:12:25 +0100] S?bastien Villemot wrote:
>Le mercredi 13 mars 2013 à 11:58 -0600, Vincent Danen a écrit :
>> This issue was given the name CVE-2010-3312 quite
Le mercredi 13 mars 2013 à 15:59 -0600, Vincent Danen a écrit :
> * [2013-03-13 22:12:25 +0100] S?bastien Villemot wrote:
>
> >Le mercredi 13 mars 2013 à 11:58 -0600, Vincent Danen a écrit :
> >> This issue was given the name CVE-2010-3312 quite a while ago. See
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
Le mercredi 13 mars 2013 à 11:58 -0600, Vincent Danen a écrit :
> This issue was given the name CVE-2010-3312 quite a while ago. See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3312 for more info.
I don’t think this is the same issue. The problem reported here is
specifically about red
This issue was given the name CVE-2010-3312 quite a while ago. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3312 for more info.
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
5 matches
Mail list logo