On 2013-03-17 17:30, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any news on this?
>>
>
> The documentation patch was submitted on the bug report
>
Okay, I was (and still am) expecting a debdiff attached to this bug
(once the changes are finalized that is).
> I'm not sure if it has been releas
On 17/03/13 17:29, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-03-06 21:46, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/03/13 21:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
>>>
>>> On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: n
On 2013-03-06 21:46, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 06/03/13 21:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
>>
>> On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> The current README.Debian is quite o
On 06/03/13 21:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
>
> On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> The current README.Debian is quite old
>>
>> It gives some advice that will lead to people
Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> The current README.Debian is quite old
>
> It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
> (e.g. no networking). It
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The current README.Debian is quite old
It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
(e.g. no networking). It describes a procedure for configuring
networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more
recently
6 matches
Mail list logo