Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-04-30 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:13:24 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:00:54PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:22:39 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: >> > It's fixed now in sid. I'm sorry for the long delay. >> >> No problem, and actually I am grateful to

Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-04-23 Thread Guido Günther
retitle 701648 Crashes when connecting to a vm thanks On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:00:54PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > notfixed 701684 0.5.5+really0.5.4-1 > thanks > > Hi there! > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:22:39 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 06:46:04PM +0100, Luca Capello

Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-04-23 Thread Luca Capello
notfixed 701684 0.5.5+really0.5.4-1 thanks Hi there! On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:22:39 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 06:46:04PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:31:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:54:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote

Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-04-17 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Luca, On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 06:46:04PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:31:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:54:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > >> After upgrading from yesterday's 0.5.4-1 to today's 0.5.5-3 the > >> virt-viewer prog

Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-03-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:30:05 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > reopen 701684 > thanks > > Luca Capello wrote: > > I just got it by this bug as well and IMHO the current solution > > (upgrading to the versions in experimental) is not fine: virt-viewer in > > sid is still broken and, after having visi

Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Proulx
reopen 701684 thanks Luca Capello wrote: > I just got it by this bug as well and IMHO the current solution > (upgrading to the versions in experimental) is not fine: virt-viewer in > sid is still broken and, after having visited the bug report, there is > no ETA for a fixed version in sid. I am s

Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-03-03 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:31:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:54:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: >> After upgrading from yesterday's 0.5.4-1 to today's 0.5.5-3 the >> virt-viewer program has disappeared from the system. >> >> # dpkg -L virt-viewer | grep bin/virt

Bug#701684: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-02-27 Thread Guido Günther
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:54:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > Package: virt-viewer > Version: 0.5.5-3 > Severity: normal > > After upgrading from yesterday's 0.5.4-1 to today's 0.5.5-3 the > virt-viewer program has disappeared from the system. > > # dpkg -L virt-viewer | grep bin/virt-viewer >

Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-02-26 Thread Uwe Storbeck
severity 701684 grave thanks Justification: renders package unusable Raising severity to grave as virt-viewer is the basic functionality of this package. Regards Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma

Bug#701684: virt-viewer no longer contains virt-viewer

2013-02-25 Thread Bob Proulx
Package: virt-viewer Version: 0.5.5-3 Severity: normal After upgrading from yesterday's 0.5.4-1 to today's 0.5.5-3 the virt-viewer program has disappeared from the system. # dpkg -L virt-viewer | grep bin/virt-viewer ...nothing... Installing the previous 0.5.4-1 restored it and worked around