Bug#701169: script does not check if microcode is really present before applying it

2013-02-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:19:53AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > I recommend that you just ignore the messages, that way you will still get > > an updated microcode if Intel decides to start shipping one for your > > processor. > > well, I

Bug#701169: script does not check if microcode is really present before applying it

2013-02-23 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:19:53AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > I recommend that you just ignore the messages, that way you will still get > an updated microcode if Intel decides to start shipping one for your > processor. well, I thought you had the toolchain for that already,

Bug#701169: script does not check if microcode is really present before applying it

2013-02-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
tag 701169 wontfix severity 701169 minor thanks On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Philipp Kern wrote: > intel-microcode's initramfs hook seems to try to load microcode > unconditionally. This causes the following error messages to appear if no Yes. > microcode is present in the package, once for every schedu

Bug#701169: script does not check if microcode is really present before applying it

2013-02-22 Thread Philipp Kern
Package: intel-microcode Version: 1.20120606.v2.2 Severity: normal Hi, intel-microcode's initramfs hook seems to try to load microcode unconditionally. This causes the following error messages to appear if no microcode is present in the package, once for every scheduling unit: [4.257698] pla