Sebastian Ramacher dixit:
>Anyway, signals intermixed with ncurses is very much out of my comfort
>zone. Maybe Thorsten (CCed) can provide additional input on those issues.
Sorry, no, no practical experience either way, but it did raise
all alarm bells here while reading it.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
On 2013-03-08 22:25:46, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I really wonder what to do at this point. I can certainly upload the 2.0
> version to experimental to allow people to test this more thoroughly
> (but then again, it's just once C file, easy enough to test). But I
> don't feel those bugs are serious
On 2013-03-08, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2013-03-06 20:02:16, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> So I ran the patched version under valgrind, which I am not familiar
>> with at all so YMMV.
>>
>> I attach the output.
>>
>> Basically, what I see is one of those:
>>
>> ==3852== Conditional jump or mov
On 2013-03-06 20:02:16, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> So I ran the patched version under valgrind, which I am not familiar
> with at all so YMMV.
>
> I attach the output.
>
> Basically, what I see is one of those:
>
> ==3852== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==3852== Use
So I ran the patched version under valgrind, which I am not familiar
with at all so YMMV.
I attach the output.
Basically, what I see is one of those:
==3852== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3852== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==3852== Syscall param rt_sigact
5 matches
Mail list logo
