On 2013-02-17 00:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [Why the CC to debian-release? That's where mail for release.d.o bugs
> goes anyway...]
I trimmed down the recipients to only the bug, but didn't switch that
from Cc: to To:
[same in this mail, but now with To: 700563@]
> Ah. In that case, you just ne
[Why the CC to debian-release? That's where mail for release.d.o bugs
goes anyway...]
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 00:39 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-02-16 21:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> Please go ahead; thanks.
> >
> > Flagged for acceptance.
>
> I only uploaded amd64 binaries - does "
On 2013-02-16 21:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Please go ahead; thanks.
>
> Flagged for acceptance.
I only uploaded amd64 binaries - does "XS-Autobuild: yes" work for
s-p-u/non-free? (It does for sid and experimental.) Or do I need to
upload i386 too? There is nothing yet on the buildd page:
http
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 18:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:57 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > * fglrx-glx{,-ia32}.preinst: Create diversions on upgrades, too.
> > * fglrx-driver.preinst: Move removal of old libdri.so diversion to
> > pos
Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:57 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> * fglrx-glx{,-ia32}.preinst: Create diversions on upgrades, too.
> * fglrx-driver.preinst: Move removal of old libdri.so diversion to postinst.
> The fglrx-driver package in lenny shipped the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I'd like to fix some upgrade issues from lenny w.r.t. to the diversion
handling in the non-free fglrx driver packages. #696155
- fglrx-glx-ia32 currently fails to upgrade at all
- fglrx-driv
6 matches
Mail list logo
