On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:58:58PM +0530, Vibhav Pant wrote:
> Attached correct diff
This patch looks better than the previous (i.e. the unused int in the
test is gone), but:
- it's targeting version 1.8.1 (we've 1.9 atm.), which is not a problem,
as it doesn't touch any files besides debian/ an
Attached correct diff
(The test would not fail as it is run using xfvb.)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alan Coopersmith <
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 02/12/13 07:11 AM, Vibhav Pant wrote:
> > The diff I had earlier attached was having some mistakes. I have
> attached the
> > c
On 02/12/13 07:11 AM, Vibhav Pant wrote:
> The diff I had earlier attached was having some mistakes. I have attached the
> correct diff.
The previous diff was at least for libxcb - this one is for a different library,
libcaca, which seems like a bigger mistake.
(The previous one seems like it wou
The diff I had earlier attached was having some mistakes. I have attached
the correct diff.
27_26.diff
Description: Binary data
4 matches
Mail list logo
