On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 07:23:58 +0900
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> by the way,
>
> asn1c)
>
> asn1c is a compiler for ASN.1 which probably won't compile any C program, is
> that a joke or did you actually find a use for it?
Just a sample to add it, probably no one use it as you say...
--
Reg
At Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:38:24 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
>
by the way,
asn1c)
asn1c is a compiler for ASN.1 which probably won't compile any C program, is
that a joke or did you actually find a use for it?
--
dancer@{netfort.gr.jp,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:33:31 +0100
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Could you push it somewhere ? I would like to do some modifications on it :)
>
> (or fork the pbuilder repository before asking for a merge)
prepare temporary repo: g...@github.com:henrich/pbuilder.git
--
Regards,
Hideki Yama
On 08/03/2013 06:38, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 05:16:26 +0900
> Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> update it, please use attached one.
>
> Update it again ;)
>
Could you push it somewhere ? I would like to do some modifications on it :)
(or fork the pbuilder repository before asking for
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 05:16:26 +0900
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> update it, please use attached one.
Update it again ;)
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
D65various-complier-support
Description: Binary data
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 04:52:51 +0900
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> file attached, tested gcc-4.6 and clang works (in my environment, at least).
> tcc failed since it refused some gcc option.
update it, please use attached one.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http:
Hi,
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:27:27 +0100
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > but your approach is more appropriate than mine, so I'll update
> > and test your script and post it to BTS later.
file attached, tested gcc-4.6 and clang works (in my environment, at least).
tcc failed since it refused some g
On 07/03/2013 19:24, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:43:10 + (UTC)
> Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> This would allow switching to any gcc version, tcc and clang;
>> adding pcc, TenDRA and other compilers is surely possible,
>> and this hook script is controlled by $PBUILDER_CO
Hi,
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:43:10 + (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> This would allow switching to any gcc version, tcc and clang;
> adding pcc, TenDRA and other compilers is surely possible,
> and this hook script is controlled by $PBUILDER_COMPILER which
> you can just export before calling pbu
Hideki Yamane dixit:
> Hookdir cannot satisfy its purpose - build with gcc, then check with clang,
> back to gcc, and use clang again... - if we choose using hookdir, we should
> add script to hookdir then remove it every time, it's not handy and doesn't
> encourage maintainers to check with clang
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:24:47 +0900
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I'm attaching a proposed hook script. Will this work for you?
I missed this, now I've checked and it works.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:59:35 +0900
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Sorry, no please use a hookdir, it's there to be used. I don't like to
> add too many options to pbuilder.
I understand you don't like too many options, but also you don't consider
the situations for usage of my proposal, as "switching"
At Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:05:32 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:02:54 +0900
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I like the way this is very compact patch, but I dislike that it
> > requires adding a config parameter to pbuilder (because it will need
> > to be propagated to co
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:02:54 +0900
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I like the way this is very compact patch, but I dislike that it
> requires adding a config parameter to pbuilder (because it will need
> to be propagated to cowbuilder etc. I wonder if it could just be
> implemented in a hook and co
Junichi Uekawa dixit:
>to be propagated to cowbuilder etc. I wonder if it could just be
>implemented in a hook and configuration.
This looks like simply a (one) hook can do it, yeah.
I’d suggest a D hook, so a package can still Build-Conflicts
on clang if needed.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
„nein: Be
I'm attaching a proposed hook script. Will this work for you?
#!/bin/bash
# Force use of clang instead of GCC.
function setup_clang() {
local GCC_VERSION=$(readlink /usr/bin/gcc | sed 's/^gcc\-//')
apt-get -y "${APTGETOPT[@]}" install clang
echo -e "\e[33mReplace gcc, g++ & cpp by cl
Hi,
Thanks for the patch.
I have a question.
At Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:01:29 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> diff -Nru pbuilder-0.213/bash_completion.d/pbuilder
> pbuilder-0.213+nmu1/bash_completion.d/pbuilder
> --- pbuilder-0.213/bash_completion.d/pbuilder 2012-03-25 14:53:45.0
> +0900
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:10:26 +0100
Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Instead of hardcoding GCC version (which can vary across different
> architectures), you can use something similar to the following:
> GCC_VERSION=$(readlink /usr/bin/gcc | sed 's/gcc-//')
Thanks Luca, that's really good than mine,
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> I've made a tiny patch for clang support in pbuilder, it runs with
> "--with-clang" option. It would make build check in clang easier,
> and encourage maintainers to do that.
>
> Could you check and apply it, please?
You need to update cowbuilder too.
Because cowbuilder and pbui
Instead of hardcoding GCC version (which can vary across different
architectures), you can use something similar to the following:
GCC_VERSION=$(readlink /usr/bin/gcc | sed 's/gcc-//')
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 11/02/2013 09:01, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Package: pbuilder
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I've made a tiny patch for clang support in pbuilder, it runs with
> "--with-clang" option. It would make build check in clang easier,
> and encoura
Package: pbuilder
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org
Hi,
I've made a tiny patch for clang support in pbuilder, it runs with
"--with-clang" option. It would make build check in clang easier,
and encourage maintainers to do that.
Could you check and apply it, ple
22 matches
Mail list logo
