Michael Neuffer [2013-02-03 23:25 +0100]:
> an't you standardize naming conventions with the other DBs?
I really don't know which one was "first", but as both "postgresql"
and "mysql-server" have been around for pretty much "ever", I don't
think it makes much sense to rename the packages and updat
On 02/03/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Michael,
Michael Neuffer [2013-02-02 11:45 +0100]:
similar to the virtual package mysql-server there should be a
package postgresql-server which always depends on the latest
postgresql release.
We have already had that for pretty much "ever": I
Package: postgresql
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
similar to the virtual package mysql-server
there should be a package postgresql-server which always depends on the
latest postgresql release.
There are even packages that already recommend postgresql-server
-- System Information:
Debi
3 matches
Mail list logo
