Control: tags -1 pending
On 2013-02-24 17:41, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-02-23 00:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Running Lintian on all our t/tests artifacts[3], this patch reduces the
>> user time with about 6 minutes. That is a drop from ~21 to ~15 minutes
>> in time's output. Rea
On 2013-01-27 11:17, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
Since converting Lintian to use autodie, it has taken quite a bit of
overhead at start up. I haven't done timings the current state of the
test suite. However, I worked a bit with upstream on reducing the overhead.
I used sentinella as a simple
On 2013-02-23 00:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> >> Running Lintian on all our t/tests artifacts[3], this patch reduces the
>>> >> user time with about 6 minutes. That is a drop from ~21 to ~15 minutes
>>> >> in time's output. Real time seems to have dropped to 5m 30s from 6m
>>> >> {0..30}s.
>>> >>
On 2013-01-31 01:05, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-01-30 14:12, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>
Just adding the current numbers so I don't forget them (and don't
compare against the wrong/old results). :)
> With this second patch on top of the previous one, the t/tests suite
> goes from:
>
>
On 2013-01-30 14:12, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
With this second patch on top of the previous one, the t/tests suite
goes from:
real9m22.148s
user58m8.566s
sys 6m45.349s
to:
real8m19.918s
user44m29.099s
sys 6m22.116s
The kfreebsd-utils packages (15 binari
On 2013-01-27 11:17, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.11
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
I have come up with a prototype patch that reduces some overhead in the
unpacker. It changes the call-interface between Lintian and the
collections, so I figured I would send it
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.11
Severity: normal
Hi,
I believe it might be worth it to look into optimizing the resource
requirements for the t/tests suite. It is my understanding that the
current testsuite is discouraging to run for some people (myself
included when I only have my laptop).
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
