On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> Martin Quinson writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:58:41PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> >> Martin Quinson writes:
> >>
> >> hi Martin,
> >>
> >> > For the reccord, the packaging work is done in the package git. If
> >> > some
Martin Quinson writes:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:58:41PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
>> Martin Quinson writes:
>>
>> hi Martin,
>>
>> > For the reccord, the packaging work is done in the package git. If
>> > someone could test it (with git-buildpackage), I will upload it.
>>
>> Thanks for d
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:58:41PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> Martin Quinson writes:
>
> hi Martin,
>
> > For the reccord, the packaging work is done in the package git. If
> > someone could test it (with git-buildpackage), I will upload it.
>
> Thanks for doing the update and for writing deb
Martin Quinson writes:
hi Martin,
> For the reccord, the packaging work is done in the package git. If
> someone could test it (with git-buildpackage), I will upload it.
Thanks for doing the update and for writing debian/download.sh!
I did a "git pull" on master, pristine-tar and upstream bran
For the reccord, the packaging work is done in the package git. If
someone could test it (with git-buildpackage), I will upload it.
Thanks, Mt.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from my Point of view, there is nothing speaking against a new version
> of j
Hi,
from my Point of view, there is nothing speaking against a new version
of jsyntaxpane. As far as I understand it, umlet does not need to be
recompiled and will work better with the new version, so please go
ahead.
Best regards
Benjamin
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 23:00 +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
6 matches
Mail list logo