* Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
> On Sun, January 6, 2013 06:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Gah. I went out of town for Saturday and Sunday. I meant to upload before
> > I left today but forgot. I just tried to now but I can't seem to reach my
> > main Debian machine. So I won't be able to
On Sun, January 6, 2013 06:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Gah. I went out of town for Saturday and Sunday. I meant to upload before
> I left today but forgot. I just tried to now but I can't seem to reach my
> main Debian machine. So I won't be able to upload before Sunday night
> Eastern USA time. So i
Gah. I went out of town for Saturday and Sunday. I meant to upload before I
left today but forgot. I just tried to now but I can't seem to reach my main
Debian machine. So I won't be able to upload before Sunday night Eastern USA
time. So if anyone wants to build it from the diff and upload feel
Hi,
* Eric Dorland [2013-01-05 14:02]:
> * Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
> > On Fri, January 4, 2013 11:39, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > >> This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
> > >
> > > Eric,
> > >
> >
Hi Eric,
On Sat, January 5, 2013 08:30, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
>> On Fri, January 4, 2013 11:39, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> > On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> >> This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
>> >
>> >
* Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
> On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
>
> Eric,
>
> Thanks for fixing this in unstable. Can you also provide an update for
> stable-security? Let me know if you prefer tha
On Fri, January 4, 2013 11:39, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
>
> Eric,
>
> Thanks for fixing this in unstable. Can you also provide an update for
> stable-security? Let me know if you pre
On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
Eric,
Thanks for fixing this in unstable. Can you also provide an update for
stable-security? Let me know if you prefer that we handle it.
Cheers,
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Thanks for the heads up. Will get to it later today.
* Christoph Anton Mitterer (cales...@scientia.net) wrote:
> btw: The corresponding redhat bug[0] seems to already contain some
> backported patches till 2.0.20 comes out.
>
>
> [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-6085
-
btw: The corresponding redhat bug[0] seems to already contain some
backported patches till 2.0.20 comes out.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-6085
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.19-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Hi.
This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
While it seems that all world fixes this only for gpg 1.4.x Werner's
bug entry[0,1] implies that 2.x is also affected.
Could you please ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
