On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 06:50:00PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > As we don't support upgrades which skip releases (i.e. Debian 4.0 to
> > Debian 6.0, or Debian 5.0 to Debian 7.0), why don't we remove all
> > those obsolete dependencies on essential pac
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 06:50:00PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> As we don't support upgrades which skip releases (i.e. Debian 4.0 to
> Debian 6.0, or Debian 5.0 to Debian 7.0), why don't we remove all
> those obsolete dependencies on essential packages instead?
That makes sense! I investigated th
El 13/12/12 18:12, Helmut Grohne escribió:
Package: base-files
Version: 7.0
Severity: normal
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
The base-files package is depended upon by a number of other tools such
as rsync. Those dependencies are mostly versioned, because base-f
Package: base-files
Version: 7.0
Severity: normal
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
The base-files package is depended upon by a number of other tools such
as rsync. Those dependencies are mostly versioned, because base-files is
essential. Nevertheless they restrict
4 matches
Mail list logo
