Hello Michael,
as far as I understand it, package names for libraries should follow
so-names where possible. Wouldn't it make sense then to name the library
package libtsk10 and keep the libtsk-dev name for the header/development
files? Since upstream decided to drop the major version from the
lib
Hello.
Since upstream renamed all the include paths from 'tsk3' to 'tsk since
v4.1.0, would it work to rename libtsk-dev to libtsk3-3-dev so that it
remains with the other libtsk3-3 libraries, and libtsk-dev becomes the
new standard following the v4.x upstream? libtsk3-3-dev can continue
to provi
* Henri Salo [Wed Jun 26, 2013 at 10:10:32AM +0300]:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:07:23PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > we're lagging quite some versions behind with our sleuthkit
> > packaging in Debian. I tried to take care of it and just pushed
> > upstream and pristine-tar branches for new u
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:07:23PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> we're lagging quite some versions behind with our sleuthkit
> packaging in Debian. I tried to take care of it and just pushed
> upstream and pristine-tar branches for new upstream version 4.1.0 of
> sleuthkit to our git repos (I hope
4 matches
Mail list logo
