Hello Don,
thanks a lot for your kind reply!
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:27:37 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> I believe the only correct way to implement this is to have a new SOAP
> call which actually asked for bugs which affected a list of packages
> which had particular severity; it would be
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Francesco Poli wrote:
> The fact is that the enhanced get_bugs() I would need would anyway
> have to internally map binary packages and binary versions to source
> packages and source versions. During this process, it would anyway
> find any non-existing binary packages among t
Control: block 536613 by -1
Control: unblock 536613 by 553661
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 10:38:59 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:38:50 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
>
> > Package: debbugs
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> [...]
> > I would need to call get_bugs() so t
Control: block 257873 by -1
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:38:50 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: debbugs
> Severity: wishlist
>
[...]
> I would need to call get_bugs() so that it returned an array with
> all the (unarchived) bug-numbers that apply to the specified binary
> version o
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
as discussed via private e-mail with Don Armstrong, I would need the
following enhancement in the BTS SOAP interface, in order to enhance
apt-listbugs (which I maintain).
Currently, one of the procedures that apt-listbugs calls via SOAP is
get_bugs(), w
5 matches
Mail list logo
