On 12/13/2012 10:18 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
But is there any reason the patch is not applied yet.
i think anonym fixed that already, no?
Would a patch to automatically relabel the filesystems in this case be
acceptable?
no, we do not want to mess with users data here.
--
Address:
Hi
Daniel Baumann writes:
> severity 694806 minor
> thanks
I don't want to argue about severities. But is there any reason the
patch is not applied yet. If it needs improvements I'd like to know so I
can update the patch. Regardless of the severity I really think that
this fix should go into th
severity 694806 minor
thanks
On 11/30/2012 03:14 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Do you expect users to relabel their filesystems
yes,
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-
Package: live-boot
Version: 3.0~b8
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Booting with a persistence filesystem that has the old "live-rw" label
results in a correct persistence.conf being written to that filesystem but the
filesystem is not used as persistence layer after boot.
This is because when mou
4 matches
Mail list logo
