That was discussed also in order to accept the package after it got in
NEW (it includes a new binary for libraries) and the maintainer had no
objections.
http://www.webpagescreenshot.info/i/83-312013102255PM.png
Best regards,
Nick
--
=Do-
N.AND
2013/3/1 Guillem Jover :
> On Tue, 2013-01-22
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 00:54:11 +0100, Nick Andrik wrote:
> 2013/1/22 Martin Meredith :
> > Why the confersion to cdbs?
> >
> > Ca I gets a debdiff?
>
> I switched to cdbs because I think (on my experience) it produces way
> much simpler debian/rules, especially now that we have to also support
> h
Why the confersion to cdbs?
Ca I gets a debdiff?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Nick Andrik wrote:
> I have prepared an NMU closing 3 bugs included this one.
>
> The updated package can be found on mentors [1]
>
> Martin, I know the package is in lowNMU [2] category, but the the
> changes a
I have prepared an NMU closing 3 bugs included this one.
The updated package can be found on mentors [1]
Martin, I know the package is in lowNMU [2] category, but the the
changes are not trivial (general cleanup, conversion to CDBS, closing
3 bugs).
So, according to the instuctions in the NMU pro
Source: unrar-nonfree
Version: 1:4.1.4-1
unrar-nonfree doesn't export build flags (CXXFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS)
and thus misses debugging symbols (-g) and the hardening flags.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
5 matches
Mail list logo
