On 25.02.2013 19:37, Olivier Berger wrote:
> I hope this will suit most people's needs.
It fits mine, thanks for your work! I'm looking forward to have this
code live so that I can write my code parsing it.
(forwarding to the bug, I reply-failed in my MUA)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
Hi.
Olivier Berger writes:
>
> Do you know an existing ontology that could be used to link this version
> information to the existing RDF content ?
>
> I'd suggest a Turtle example (see
> http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2012/08/29/debian-package-tracking-system-now-produce
On 11/23/2012 12:53 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
> You mean PTS, right ?
I do, sorry for the confusion :)
>> machine-readable information about the package. However, it misses the
>> information from the versions column (i.e. the current version of a
>> package told apart per suite). It would be sup
Hi.
Arno Töll writes:
> The RDF pages for a package in the BTS contains lots of
You mean PTS, right ?
> machine-readable information about the package. However, it misses the
> information from the versions column (i.e. the current version of a
> package told apart per suite). It would be sup
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The RDF pages for a package in the BTS contains lots of machine-readable
information about the package. However, it misses the information from the
versions column (i.e. the current version of a package told apart per suite).
It would be
super handy to ha
5 matches
Mail list logo
