On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > But rebuilding it in sid now with the proposed patch would make it
> > uninstallable in wheezy, which still has swig2.0 2.0.7.
> > I guess we should tag this bug 'sid' for the time being?
> I agree, this bug only applies to sid. Setting t
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:17:30PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:20:48 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > This has now made python-dolphin not installable in sid since the version of
> > swig in sid has passed to 2.0.8-1 on 2012-10-31. However, python-dolphin
> > still
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:20:48 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> This has now made python-dolphin not installable in sid since the version of
> swig in sid has passed to 2.0.8-1 on 2012-10-31. However, python-dolphin still
> depends on swig2.0 (>= 2.0.7), swig2.0 (<< 2.0.8~).
>
> Hence raising severity
This has now made python-dolphin not installable in sid since the version of
swig in sid has passed to 2.0.8-1 on 2012-10-31. However, python-dolphin still
depends on swig2.0 (>= 2.0.7), swig2.0 (<< 2.0.8~).
Hence raising severity to serious.
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Sys
Package: dolfin
Version: 1.0.0-7
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Must the versions of swig2.0 really be hardcoded?
Julien suggested determining it at build time, in bug #675207 #90.
But that appears to have not been implemented. Here's an implementation.
It's ugly, but does the trick.
Thanks for con
5 matches
Mail list logo
