On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:28:40 +0100 Hendrik Weimer wrote:
> Sylvestre Ledru writes:
>
> > From it last few releases, geogebra is released under GPL with a non
> > commercial clause.
> >
> > Besides the fact that it seems invalid, it also ships Jlatexmath (which
I co
> > maintain) which is publishe
Bruce Perens writes:
> On 01/29/2014 09:57 AM, Hendrik Weimer wrote:
>> If *all* languages are equally stored in a separate file, then
>> removing this file will stop the program from working.
> Another file could be substituted for it, one created using a
> clean-room process so that we are cert
On 01/29/2014 09:57 AM, Hendrik Weimer wrote:
If *all* languages are equally stored in a separate file, then
removing this file will stop the program from working.
Another file could be substituted for it, one created using a clean-room
process so that we are certain it's not derivative, and the
Bruce Perens writes:
> Internationalization files are derivative works if they
> internationalize strings that were created by someone else. And if
> those strings were part of an original GPL work there is potentially a
> license violation. But if they were created by the same author as the
> GP
Internationalization files are derivative works if they internationalize
strings that were created by someone else. And if those strings were part of an
original GPL work there is potentially a license violation. But if they were
created by the same author as the GPL program they are not derivat
Sylvestre Ledru writes:
> From it last few releases, geogebra is released under GPL with a non
> commercial clause.
>
> Besides the fact that it seems invalid, it also ships Jlatexmath (which I co
> maintain) which is published under the GPL v2.
If the program is a derived work of both the GPLed
On 28/01/2014 11:28, Hendrik Weimer wrote:
> Sylvestre Ledru writes:
>
>> From it last few releases, geogebra is released under GPL with a non
>> commercial clause.
>>
>> Besides the fact that it seems invalid, it also ships Jlatexmath (which I co
>> maintain) which is published under the GPL v2.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:22:31PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> Section 7 of the GPL-3 (if it's not -3, there's a clause in other
> versions of the GPL as well)
I see now that they claim their installer is the only non-commericial
thing. This seems like something you can just strip from the
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 03:03:53AM -0800, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> From it last few releases, geogebra is released under GPL with a non
> commercial
> clause.
>
> Besides the fact that it seems invalid, it also ships Jlatexmath (which I co
> maintain) which is published under the GPL
Hello,
>From it last few releases, geogebra is released under GPL with a non
commercial clause.
Besides the fact that it seems invalid, it also ships Jlatexmath (which
I co maintain) which is published under the GPL v2.
As you can see on the Debian thread (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
10 matches
Mail list logo
