On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:34:44 +0100
Stefan Baur wrote:
>
> In the meantime, could you please tell us the output of
> echo $PATH (just for completeness)?
It was 'inverted' precisely because of old Freeswitch problems
(conflicts between FS compiled libs & system libs):
echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/
Am 24.11.2012 01:25, schrieb Bzzz:
we here at the Debian Bug Squashing Party currently taking place at the
Linuxhotel in Essen, Germany tried to replicate your bug.
Hehe, Essen is a nice place.
And so is the Linuxhotel there. ;-)
We are *not* seeing the issue when calling "iceape" on a reg
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:09:13 +0100
Stefan Baur wrote:
> Hi Jiff,
Hi Stephan und Michael,
> we here at the Debian Bug Squashing Party currently taking place at the
> Linuxhotel in Essen, Germany tried to replicate your bug.
Hehe, Essen is a nice place.
> We are *not* seeing the issue when cal
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:00:51 +0100
Michael Banck wrote:
Hi,
> > > I am not able to reproduce this at all.
>
> Me neither, FWIW.
Weird, I found some quite old posts on other distros about this error
but most of these were due to a pkg compilation error.
I also purged and reinstall xulrunner &
Errm. Sorry. We're not seeing the *same* error message, we're seeing
/usr/lib/iceape/iceape-bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory.
Please do perform the checks we asked you to perform in our previous
message - even thoug
Hi Jiff,
we here at the Debian Bug Squashing Party currently taking place at the
Linuxhotel in Essen, Germany tried to replicate your bug.
We are *not* seeing the issue when calling "iceape" on a regular user's
shell.
"which iceape", in our case, returns "/usr/bin/iceape" (which is a shell
s
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:19:12PM +0100, Bzzz wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:52:36 -0500
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I am not able to reproduce this at all.
Me neither, FWIW.
> A ldd on /usr/lib/iceape/libxul.so returns close to 50 libs :(
Please post the output of "ldd /usr/lib/iceape
control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo
I am not able to reproduce this at all.
> ii linux-image-2. 2.6.39-3~bpo i386 Linux 2.6.39 for modern PCs
> ii linux-image-3. 3.2.20-1~bpo i386 Linux 3.2 for modern PCs
I see that you're runnig a backports kernel. Those are quite a bit
b
8 matches
Mail list logo