Bug#690248: unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi Bdale, Bdale Garbee wrote (28 Dec 2012 21:42:25 GMT) : > I don't care if this version promotes to wheezy or not. Well noted. > I thought at one point it was a goal to get more hardening done for > wheezy packages, Sure it was, and I, for one, do hope that dh compat level >= 9 brings even mor

Bug#690248: unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1

2012-12-28 Thread Bdale Garbee
Ivo De Decker writes: > Looking at the changelog however, the change "move to use of dh in rules, > compat 9 to enable hardening" is most likely in conflict with the freeze > policy: > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html I don't care if this version promotes to wheezy or not. I

Bug#690248: unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1

2012-12-28 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Bdale, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:13:55AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Please unblock package yforth. This version is a new upstream release > that fixes bug #687348 which was originally filed as RC but which I > downgraded to important. The claim was that yforth ha

Bug#690248: unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1

2012-10-11 Thread Bdale Garbee
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Please unblock package yforth. This version is a new upstream release that fixes bug #687348 which was originally filed as RC but which I downgraded to important. The claim was that yforth had a non-free license, which I did not completely agree with.