Control: tags -1 -unreproducible
On 01.02.2014 17:23, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2014-02-01 17:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Therefore removing the wheezy tag, as the new issue only affects sid.
>
>> Is that "only sid" or "sid and jessie"? You said the former, but the
>> bug is tagged "sid jess
On 2014-02-01 17:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Therefore removing the wheezy tag, as the new issue only affects sid.
> Is that "only sid" or "sid and jessie"? You said the former, but the
> bug is tagged "sid jessie" implying you might mean the other.
I don't know, haven't tried (and don't plan to
On 2014-02-01 16:39, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - wheezy
>
> On Sunday, 10. March 2013 03:50:40 Andres Mejia wrote:
>> At this time, being this late into the release cycle, I would like to
>> support only the default-jdk. I am building with sbuild using a chroot
>> created by sbuild
Control: tag -1 - wheezy
On Sunday, 10. March 2013 03:50:40 Andres Mejia wrote:
> At this time, being this late into the release cycle, I would like to
> support only the default-jdk. I am building with sbuild using a chroot
> created by sbuild-createchroot as I believe this closely matches what
>
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi there,
the package fails to build when rebuilding with sbuild in a current sid
chroot, so I'm raising severity to "serious" again:
[junit] - Standard Error -
[junit] Feb 01, 2014 2:55:08 PM
org.jdesktop.application.ResourceManag
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:42 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:12:32 -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
>
>> I just rebuilt bsaf on my machine that has the DISPLAY environment variable
>> set and
>
> In a chroot or in the "normal" environment?
The "normal" environment.
>> on a sid and w
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:42:09 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> As mentioned earlier in this bug log by Matteo, building with
> openjdk-7-jdk works in the same setup.
Not anymore:
[junit] Running org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonito
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:12:32 -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
> I just rebuilt bsaf on my machine that has the DISPLAY environment variable
> set and
In a chroot or in the "normal" environment?
> on a sid and wheezy chroot via sbuild-shell (which in turn uses
> schroot) that does not have DISPLAY set
On Monday, January 7, 2013, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 07:48 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:13:35 +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
>>
>> I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk,
>>> which uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headle
On 01/07/2013 07:48 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:13:35 +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk,
which uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24.
It builds just fine.
Is this really still an issue?
It still
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:13:35 +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk,
> which uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24.
> It builds just fine.
> Is this really still an issue?
It still fails to build for me in wheezy and sid ch
Hey,
I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk, which
uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24.
It builds just fine.
Is this really still an issue?
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
690152 fixed 1.9-3
thanks
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: bsaf
> Version: 1.9-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:36:09 +, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
> The stack trace led me to suspect the root cause of the issue lies
> in the java.beans package.
>
> I built the bsaf sources and tests with the default jdk
> (/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -> java-6-openjdk) and then ran the
> entire testsui
Hi,
The stack trace led me to suspect the root cause of the issue lies in
the java.beans package.
I built the bsaf sources and tests with the default jdk
(/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -> java-6-openjdk) and then ran the entire
testsuite with openjdk-7-jdk by changing the exported JAVA_HOME to
The first failing test is BadSessionStateTest. The first exception in
the log is actually expected:
[junit] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
[junit] at
com.sun.beans.ObjectHandler.dequeueResult(ObjectHandler.java:189)
[junit] at
java.beans.XMLDecode
Hi,
Here's what I found out so far about this bug.
Unsetting the DISPLAY environment variable works around the FTBFS error
by skipping the failing Junit tests. However, unsetting DISPLAY is not
the preferable/acceptable solution, as it simply skips the failing tests.
Check out the build.xml.
* gregor herrmann wrote [24.10.12 17:13]:
Hi,
> Running the tests under xvfb I get a different failure:
JFTR I get the exact same error messages running it directly in X11.
> (and it goes on and on for pages)
>
> So: no idea :/
>
> (I'm still attaching the change to use xvfb which seems to be
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:21:04 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> >> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
> >> build on amd64.
> > I couldn't reproduce this in wheezy or sid, but I was only using pbuilder
> > to test.
> I was able to get the build to fail by setting DISPLA
On 10/10/2012 07:12 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Source: bsaf
>> Version: 1.9-3
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: wheezy sid
>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs
>> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy o
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: bsaf
> Version: 1.9-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages i
Source: bsaf
Version: 1.9-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bui
22 matches
Mail list logo
