On 2012-12-27 22:17, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) :
>> intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
>>> How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
>>> current testing's gpa?
>
> It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e0054
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) :
> intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
>> How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
>> current testing's gpa?
It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e00549 [1].
I'm not fluent at C, but the relevant part o
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
> How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
> current testing's gpa?
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.o
tags 689706 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Leidert wrote (05 Oct 2012 10:50:17 GMT) :
> So what is your opinion? Can we agree on uploading gpa 0.9.3 to
> unstable and unblocking this version or do you reject this request?
> If you agree, I would upload and then downgrade severity of #634930.
How h
4 matches
Mail list logo