On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:03:37AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > While I would ultimately like to put 1.6.4-3~bpo60+1 into
> > backports, this is not currently advisable: the 1.6.x
> > releases have not yet had extensive testing with t
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:03:37AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > While I would ultimately like to put 1.6.4-3~bpo60+1 into
> > backports, this is not currently advisable: the 1.6.x
> > releases have not yet had extensive testing with t
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> While I would ultimately like to put 1.6.4-3~bpo60+1 into
> backports, this is not currently advisable: the 1.6.x
> releases have not yet had extensive testing with the
> stable/stable-backports toolchain and library versions,
> while the 1.4
3 matches
Mail list logo
