On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:10:05PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Yep, that's already been reported at 683116
Thanks.
Regards
Artur
--
Blogi to bastardy WWW, które się po nocach ryćkało z top-postingiem.
/Leslie/
--
To UNSUBS
forcemerge 683116 688519
thanks
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> For each binary package built from libqglviewer source, apt-cache show shows
> only Description-en field.
Yep, that's already been reported at 683116
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, mat
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:08:49PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> So your problem is that utils.get_source_package(package) doesn't
> return any list of (package, description); this could be either
> because
> apt-cache showsrc libqglviewe
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 08:42:56PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> python -c "from reportbug import utils ; package = 'libqglviewer' ;
>> print utils.get_package_status(package, avail=True) ; info =
>> utils.get_source_package(package) ; p
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 08:42:56PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> python -c "from reportbug import utils ; package = 'libqglviewer' ;
> print utils.get_package_status(package, avail=True) ; info =
> utils.get_source_package(package) ; print info ; print
> utils.get_package_status(info[0][0]) if info e
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> does
>> apt-cache showsrc libqglviewer
>> output something?
> Yes. The output is attached.
good, can you report the output of this command (all on a single line):
python
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> does
> apt-cache showsrc libqglviewer
> output something?
Yes. The output is attached.
Regards
Artur
--
Documentation is like sex: When it is good, it is very, very, good.
And when it is bad, it is better than nothing.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
>> > Choose the request type: 2
>> > Please enter the package name: libqglviewer
>> > Checking status database.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > Choose the request type: 2
> > Please enter the package name: libqglviewer
> > Checking status database...
> > This package doesn't appear to exist; continue? [y|N|?]?
> D
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> Choose the request type: 2
> Please enter the package name: libqglviewer
> Checking status database...
> This package doesn't appear to exist; continue? [y|N|?]?
Do you have source line (aka deb-src) in /etc/apt/sources.list ? If
not,
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.4.3
Severity: normal
In following transcript the libqglviewer is a proper source package name. In
this context, I believe,
reportbug shall use it, instead of expecting binary package.
arturcz@szczaw:~$ reportbug wnpp
Detected character set: UTF-8
Please change your
11 matches
Mail list logo
