Bug#688015: [PATCH] Re: Bug#688015: memory leak

2012-12-16 Thread Dominik
I have patched version 6.3.18-2 and compiled it like the original package. The result is: ==2620== LEAK SUMMARY: ==2620==definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==2620==indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==2620== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==2620==still reachable: 8,328,8

Bug#688015: [PATCH] Re: Bug#688015: memory leak

2012-12-13 Thread Matthias Andree
Now that was a useful pointer, thanks a bunch! We have had this leak ever since the subjectAltName support was added in 2005 (fetchmail 6.2.9)... it strikes whenever we manage to extract these fields from a certificate while verifying it. This bug only hurts in daemon mode, because the leak accum