Hi Julien,
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 00:45:28 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 20:07:07 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > For stable-security backporting security issues wasn't feasible due to
> > a lack of continued upstream support for 1.8.x and invasive/complex
> > changes. This shoul
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 20:07:07 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> For stable-security backporting security issues wasn't feasible due to
> a lack of continued upstream support for 1.8.x and invasive/complex
> changes. This shouldn't happen again. If there's no commitment from
> upstream to suppo
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:07:18 Julien Cristau wrote:
> At this point my preference would go towards removing zabbix from
> wheezy. The new version was uploaded too late for the freeze, and if
> nobody's fixing 1.8 then there's no point shipping that.
It is true that 1.8 have problems that we alread
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 14:18:26 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I seek your advise regarding the possibility for unblocking package 'zabbix'.
>
> This is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
I seek your advise regarding the possibility for unblocking package 'zabbix'.
This is a major upgrade, not compliant with freeze policy and there were great
many change
5 matches
Mail list logo
