On 2012-10-04 22:45, brian.thoma...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> I'm happy to make whatever changes are necessary to this package, but I'm
> not sure what is gained by providing Breaks for every potential package
> affected by a bouncycastle upgrade. It seems to me more proper that if
> packa
Hi,
I'm happy to make whatever changes are necessary to this package, but I'm
not sure what is gained by providing Breaks for every potential package
affected by a bouncycastle upgrade. It seems to me more proper that if
package X depends on bouncycastle = version Y (which appears to be the case
2 matches
Mail list logo
